Wednesday, April 3, 2013

IPR Exclusive: Interview With Cody Quirk, Nevada CP Activist Seeking To Unite All Constitutionalist Parties

Originally published on IPR on January 9, 2013. 

To supplement an IPR article, published two days ago, that concerned the founding of the Clarion Call to Unite Committee (CCTUC), I decided to conduct an interview with the founder of the organization, Cody Quirk. Mr. Quirk is an activist active in the Independent American Party of Nevada, the state affiliate of the Constitution Party. He says he wants CCTUC to work to unite all small right-wing constitutionalist parties and bring them under the Constitution Party banner. 

Krzysztof Lesiak:

When did you decide to create CCTUC, and what is the stated purpose of that group?

Cody Quirk

I started the CCTUC this last November, on the 14th. It was something that had been on my mind for awhile long before the 2012 Election, however. I admit in the past that I have tried to talk to the other constitutionalist parties out there, yet back then the circumstances were much different, I was younger and therefore less politically experienced- so my previous efforts were rather half-hearted and amateurish,’ you could say. However, after the last election, the times and circumstances have changed greatly from before. The political situation in this country has gotten to be so desperate and unstable that I’m finally going to put my foot down and end the division that has existed nationally among constitutionalists and like-minded patriots in order to deal with the dire situation in our country once and for all. We can no longer tolerate division and infighting in our ranks; the decline of this great nation is rapidly speeding downhill, so we must all band together to put a stop to it- but that won’t happen until all the national and state parties that are both constitutionalist and principled-conservative unify under one banner; I’m a firm believer of that.

Krzysztof Lesiak

What are some of the parties that you seek to bring into the CP fold, and how do you exactly plan on accomplishing this task?

Cody Quirk

We are reaching out to several parties besides the Constitution Party; we have reached out to the National Independent American Party, the America First Party, the American Party of Florida (the American Party disbanded nationally some time ago, and only have a single state entity left), and several other lesser known minor constitutionalist parties, including the American Patriot Party, and several state Reform Party groups that are constitutionalist, or conservative, in their platform and beliefs. So far the National IAP has officially expressed interest in working towards a merger of the parties, and, in fact, since the National IAP also wants to cooperate better and work closer with the CP, I am actively helping their party on a few matters of their own while still an official member of the CP. The IAP leaders know this, but understand that I am helping them to better promote friendship and harmony between the CP and their party, while also giving support to their party in a way that is beneficial to the constitutionalist cause in general. I also have a few remaining members of the Florida AP that are supportive of our cause and have joined our facebook page a few weeks ago. The AFP leaders have expressed an interest in our efforts, yet sometimes they can be difficult to get in touch with. But likewise with the CP itself, many of its leaders and members, including a potential CP candidate for President in 2016, Robby Wells, have approached us and volunteered to help us as well, and so far many of them, including Mr. Wells, have contributed a great amount of their time and resources to the Clarion Call To Unite Committee, in which we are thankful for such assistance. However, that said, because of the ambitious nature of our goals, I cannot divulge much about the specifics of our negotiations and progress, since we are also being cautious and keeping an eye out for any attempts of sabotage and entryism. There was a previous group several years ago, which shared a similar name to ours, that attempted the same thing that we are trying, yet they were too open and public about their efforts, and within months the leader of this group (of whom I have had past correspondence with), suddenly ended his efforts, deleted his email account and went off the online grid, along with the group itself, that likewise disbanded. I found that suspicious then and still do, so this time around, we are being careful and semi-confidential in our efforts, and also have taken certain measures to combat any attempts to ruin or derail our efforts too.

Krzysztof Lesiak

Now tell me, are there any minor right-wing parties you WON’T be reaching out to?

Cody Quirk

Yes, there are a few; on the “conservative” side, there’s the ‘Conservative Party USA’, which is generally neoconservative, supported Rick Santorum over Ron Paul in the GOP primary, and endorsed Mitt Romney for President. While I have had past correspondence with Sam Gallo, their National Chairman, that was positive, unfortunately their actions and rhetoric do not make them a desired partner for us, since our focus is on parties that are constitutionalist, paleo-conservative, or conservative in a way that doesn’t conflict with the principles that most like-minded constitutionalists share. And on the extremist side, we especially will not include the so called ‘Christian Liberty Party’ or the recently founded ‘Christian Party’, since for starters, they do not accept Non-Christians, or even ‘certain types’ of Christians in their parties, and their attitude, while using constitutionalist-sounding rhetoric, and is theocratic instead of constitutionalist. Another factor with these two parties is that many of them are made up of former CP’ers that were part of a extremist minority faction that used to exist in the CP many years ago, and inconspicuously attempted to transform the CP into those two current political parties that they are members and leaders of. Nevertheless, even if we leave aside their dogmatic beliefs and viewpoints, they are not viable or competent enough when it comes to commitments to constant political activism, ballot access, running for office, etc. Ditto on such parties like ‘American Third Position’; we refuse to include white supremacists and such like-minded people in our efforts of bringing the parties together.

Krzysztof Lesiak

On December 1, 2012, at the Constituiton Party National Committee Meeting, Robby Wells, 2016 presidential candidate, announced to the CP members that he was a national spokesman for the CCTUC. What exactly is Robby’s role in the CCTUC, and how do you believe he will help your brand new organization achieve its goals?

Cody Quirk

First off, while there has been some stated concerns about this matter, I want to publicly emphasize that the CCTUC IS NOT A VEHICLE FOR ROBBY WELLS’S CAMPAIGN! I founded the CCTUC on my own, and he later approached us wanting to support our goal and offered assistance, so we accepted his help, and it was I who designated Mr. Wells as our group’s spokesman; he did not request that he become a leader in our group at all. I simply made the choice on my own to include him as a leader, or specifically, our ‘National Spokesman’ due to his talents, resources, and ability to travel often. And so far he has been a great asset to our efforts. Yet, I also want to emphasize that the CCTUC is also NOT officially backing him, or anyone else for president in 2016,  nor will the CCTUC endorse candidates for office, period; our focus and efforts are strictly on party-organizing & building, or specifically, ‘party unification’ ONLY. However, we do allow candidates to advertise their campaigns on our facebook page as long as there isn’t a rival candidate from another party that we are in negotiations with that is running for the same office. However, if such advertisements do become a distraction that could hinder our efforts, then we will change the rules on campaign advertising on our facebook page if necessary, in order to prevent any debates or complaints on such topics from getting out of hand. So in conclusion, people like Robby Wells have plenty of good and valuable things to offer us and our cause, yet all can be rest assured that he is helping us because, just like me and my fellow patriots in the CCTUC, he wants to see a unified constitutionalist/conservative party be able to rise up at the ballot box, take on our current political system… And win.

Krzysztof Lesiak

Now tell us, have you gotten any closer to your goals materializing since founding CCTUC? Have you spoken to leaders of America First Party, IAP, etc., about merging with the CP? Are these leaders open to dialogue with your organization?

Cody Quirk

That answer is certainly yes, but again, I cannot go into specifics on just how much success and breakthrough we have already made, and will soon make. But I will say that, unlike before November 6 of last year, some of the leaders and outspoken members of these parties, including the CP, wouldn’t have been receptive to the idea of a unified national party as they are now. Yet the re-election of Barack Obama and other related factors have certainly changed many narrow-minds and hard-hearts out there, and many in the parties that we are talking to obviously understand this well. You know I must admit, as bad as the political, and even the cultural situation is in this country right now- I believe, unlike many times in the recent past, that the circumstances for every constitutionalist & principled-conservative political party and group to unite for the greater cause of not just preserving what liberties we have left, but also restoring those liberties that we formally enjoyed before, along with our sacred Constitution and our American, Constitutional Republic -as the Founding Fathers intended us to be, and as we and my fellow patriots intend to restore, and protect -have never been in our favor as it is now.  The GOP can no longer effectively fight against the radical socialist agenda that continues to advance further into the realms of our government and society, and Americans, especially those that believe as we do, are now waking up like never before in our nation’s history to the stark reality that not just the major parties, but the political system has failed them completely, and therefore must be changed. This is a unique, and unstable time we are living in now- but it’s the perfect time for a political party like the one we are attempting to create, to rise up and bring needed change and restoration in our government and legislatures. The GOP did this in back in the days of Lincoln, only this time, such a political party that we seek would work to restore constitutional government and greater liberty in a way that no other predecessor has ever accomplished.

Krzysztof Lesiak

 Now tell us, besides a Facebook group, do you have a website for CCTUC? Twitter? Any other social media page? Have you created an official website for your organization? Also, how are you getting the word out to people about the CCTUC? Are you actively promoting it on your new blog, Independent and Third Party News and Views?

Cody Quirk

Yes, being the Editor & Owner (and founder), of Independent Third Party News & Views- I am certainly promoting it on my news site already, and as I’ve recently become a writer for the Hammer of Truth website as well, I certainly will do likewise there too. In the next coming weeks, the CCTUC will also be launching a web site; I will give an official announcement about it before then, and yes, we are promoting our group and our cause on Facebook. We haven’t gotten a Twitter account yet, but we will soon get one set up. However, while we are certainly trying to reach out to all the national & state parties out there that are constitutionalist. or principled conservative, as I mentioned before- again, we are still being cautious will just how much, and what kind of attention we attract. It’s a double-edged sword; the more attention you get for your cause, the more support and people, that will flock to it- but at the same time it will also attract the attention of people and groups that either are opposed to your cause, or want to use or hijack your cause for their own agenda. So, the best path for us to pursue is rather a grassroots outreach effort that seeks more support and attention, but at the same time isn’t going to run around screaming and waving our arms for everyone to see; for a group like this, you have to be sensible, modest, and friendly, yet guarded, meticulous, and coordinated at the same time. In that manner, your enemies (or any opposition) could see and talk to you, yet won’t be able to completely know your exact plans or even your next move.

Krzysztof Lesiak

Cody, we wish you luck with your efforts. But I now want to ask u a different type of question: Do you ever think you will rejoin IPR in the future? I, for one, want to see you back with us!!!

Cody Quirk

Out of courtesy to Independent Political Report itself, I will not elaborate or comment on the events that happened in which I no longer write for, and am at odds with, several individuals that are associated with IPR. For the time being, I prefer to be in charge of my own news site where I make and set the rules & guidelines, which I, and those that contribute to my site consider to be fair, practical, and reasonable for ITPN&V. However, who knows what the future holds? But thank you for the compliment, I appreciate it.

Krzysztof Lesiak

Have you run for political office before? if so, for what office(s)? What was your best percentage? How long have you been an active CP member, have you been to national conventions, how have you helped the party grow? Also what is your profession?

Cody Quirk

Yes, I ran for the Nevada State Senate, Capital District, back in 2010. I admit I didn’t campaign actively and had little money to spend, so I did the best I could- even though the leading candidate I was running against was a third-generation Nevadan, was well known and actually was quite conservative and did work with my state party on a few legislative matters in the past. Yet I still ran to represent my party and be a ‘third voice’ in my race, and on election night, I got about 4.9% of the vote.  I had fun, and the campaigning I was able to do certainly opened my eyes to the many issues and tough situations that Nevadans still face in this state. I may run for another office again in the future, but I’ll certainly campaign differently then I did before if I do. Anyway, I have been a member of this party since I was 17. I am from southern California and got active, became a County Chairman, and later became the Sergeant-At-Arms for the American Independent Party (the then California affiliate of the CP) starting when I turned 18. In fact, I consider the founder of the AIP (and co-founder of the CP)- the late William K. Shearer, a close friend and my political mentor, in which much of what I’ve learned about political activism, outreach, and campaigning were valuable lessons that he passed on to me, and others. Truth is, one of the reasons I founded the CCTUC and am attempting to unite the parties is also to restore and magnify his ‘legacy’ in the party, and upon American politics itself- he passed away several years ago from cancer, sadly. Later on, due to the political and economic situation in that state, I relocated to Carson City, Nevada in 2008 and got involved with the Nevada IAP (which is affiliated with the CP, of course), in which I currently serve as the Carson City Central Committee Chairman, and also the State Youth Chairman for the party. I have several members in my Young Independent Americans group so far, and have a YIA contact up at University of Nevada, Reno. Our course I’ve been to many local and state party meetings, but I’ve never been to a national CP meeting… yet. I hope to change that soon, however. On the journalism front, I used to write for the former website Third Party Watch, until it was shut down, and wrote for IPR afterwards for some time. Currently, I run & write for Independent Third Party News & Views. I admit that when I was younger I was more brash, outspoken, and not as humble as I am now, especially on the blogs and discussion forums in the past. On my personal dozier, I am 28, was previously married, and have a wonderful 6 year-old daughter. I am of Irish, Scottish, and German descent, so I am extremely stubborn, persistent, bold, and very individualistic in my personality, and my family is the exact same way: we each pursue our own path and do things by our own rules, and for the time being, I am still the only constitutionalist in the Quirk clan, though I hope to eventually change that. My personal hobbies are writing fiction and poetry; I someday hope to start a career as a writer- I do not intend to ever become a ‘career politician.; I am simply an activist & an officer for a political party and nothing more, and these efforts of mine are only to help change the system and our country for the better. I simply want to make a difference, that is all, but I want to do it outside of the box, which I why I am not involved in a major party at all and never will be. Regardless of how difficult such a path is, I have no regrets and won’t compromise on that matter. By the way, my last name is Irish of course- ‘Quirk’ is the Anglicized form of the Gaelic word ‘Cuirc’, which means ‘heart’ or ‘bravery’ in that language.

Cody’s new blog can be found by clicking on the following link:

http://itpn-v.blogspot.com/

CCTUC Facebook group:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/425431127510568/?fref=ts



Monday, April 1, 2013

BREAKING NEWS: Bob Barr and Wayne Allyn Root Re-Join Libertarian Party, To Run As Ticket In 2016

This was originally published on IPR, on April 1, 2013. 

By Krzysztof Lesiak 

Just a few short days ago, on March 28th, the 2008 Libertarian Party presidential nominee and former congressman Bob Barr announced that he will be running for U.S. Congress in 2014, in the 11 congressional district, as a Republican. Back in 2011, Barr had sworn off the Libertarian Party, and re-joined the GOP. The one time champion of DOMA, avowed drug warrior and unconstitutional war supporter came back to his original roots. First, he proudly endorsed Newt Gingrich instead of Ron Paul, and then strongly backed Mitt Romney in the general election. With this congressional campaign, Libertarians of all stripes thought they had gotten rid of the former CIA agent and accidentalBorat star once and for all.

But not so.

Today, the third party world was shocked and rocked to its core by the announcement that Barr issued today:
“I announced that I will be running for Congress a few days ago, in the district that fellow “Georgia peach,” Rep. Phil Gingrey, is retiring from. However, upon much deliberation and consternation, I have concluded that this is not the right course for me to take.

Rather, I am officially announcing that I am rejoining my political home, the Libertarian Party, today. The LP stands for all the ideals and values that I have pretended to stand for. Also, they are a good way for me to build up my own brand, as I am an opportunist with a significantly inflated ego and self image. The LP proved, in 2008, that it is willing to sell out all its core values and beliefs to nominate a neoconservative, Big-Government statist like myself. So I have no reason to think they won’t do it again. I fooled them once, but I can fool them again.

So today, I am announcing that I will be running for President of these great United States seeking the Libertarian Party nomination. I have a great amount of personal wealth, so I will be able to buy votes and cut back room deals to ensure my nomination if necessary. Furthermore, having just gotten off the phone with several LP leaders, I will have the full support of the top-dawn faction and the so-called “Libertarian Reform Caucus”. Bill Redpath and Mark Hinkle, former LNC chairs, have each pledged $1,000 to my campaign already.

Furthermore, I am announcing that my fellow neoconservative, and LP infiltrator, Wayne Allyn Root, will be running with me as a ticket, for the office of Vice-President of the United States. Wayne is a talented Republican operative who wants to transform the Libertarian Party in to just another statist wing of the GOP, as I do. He is also a committed Zionist, like myself, and believes as I do that $3 billion a year to tiny Israel is not even close to being anywhere sufficient to finance their campaign of violence and terror against the Palestinians.

My 3 main platform planks:

1. Increase yearly aid to Israel from $3 billion to $800 billion. We must protect this sacred nation, at all costs. We are one with Israel! We will not rest until every Palestinian man, woman, and child is dead!

2. Promote Big Government statism wherever possible. I will strictly enforce DOMA as President and support more funding for the never-ending War on  Drugs. Also, I will support more war, and increasing the warfare state. Hell, I’ll also support increasing the welfare state while I’m at it. I will support repealing ObamaCare and replacing it with a new plan, jointly coauthored with my good friend, Governor Romney, called BarromneyCare. And since I was once a big fan of the Patriot Act (I voted for it), I will enforce the NDDA to the fullest extent possible. Drones killing American  citizens on American soil without due process of law? You bet! Among my many other plans to enforce an Orwellian dystopian superstate and grow the American empire to the breaking point.


3. Change the LP to be a neocon mouthpiece, and a bastion of hatred for liberty and small government, just as the GOP currently is. Given my record in Congress, it’s in my nature to promote ideas that are polar opposites of what the  LP platform currently stands for. Wayne will help me in this venture. He already was able to inflict a great deal of damage to the LP and its image among libertarians; I will help him wreck this party further. For more information, please visit our new website, www.destroythelp.com. For our detailed step by step plan on how we plan on completely hijacking and subverting this party, please visit the following link:http://www.destroythelp.com/diabolical-plan-to-hijack-the-LP-and-finish-the-work-we-started-in-2008.

Thank you, and God Bless the CIA and Project COINTELPRO! My campaign is being sponsored by this organization and project.

Yours against liberty,

Bob Barr and Wayne Allyn Root

Speaking to reporters, Wayne Allyn Root (who has proposed a campaign slogan, “Create more WAR!”),  said that “The Libertarian Party is just a bunch of idiots. I was able to not just win their vice-presidential nomination, but come close to being their actual chairman and was elected to the LNC. We will dupe those motherf*ckers once again, don’t you worry. The Republican National Committee has endorsed our efforts, and my comrade, Reince Priebus, even stated, ‘Once you guys finish off the LP once and for all, we will use your expertise to purge the GOP from these Godawful Ron Paul supporters, ‘libertarian kids’ and ‘wacko birds’. This will complete our project to completely annihilate the Liberty Movement and scatter its supporters to the four winds.’ Furthermore, he pledged an annual donation of $5 million to our campaign straight from the GOP’s coffers.”

Stay tuned for more up to the minute coverage of these breaking developments on IPR.

Sunday, March 31, 2013

My Interview With Darryl W. Perry, First Announced Candidate for 2016 LP Presidential Nomination

This article was originally published on March 31, 2013 on IPR. 

Darryl W. Perry is a writer whose articles are published in several publications, including the monthly newspaper The Sovereign.  He is a co-host on a radio show on Liberty Radio Network. He is the owner and managing editor of Free Press Publications (FPP.cc). Perry is a co-founder and co-chairman of the New Hampshire Liberty Party, a party created in September 2012 to promote secession of the state from the federal government and individual liberty. From 2010 to July 2012, he served as the chairman of a small libertarian political party, the Boston Tea Party. He has announced that he is running for president in 2016 seeking the Libertarian Party line (http://dwp2016.org/).

  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok before we begin talking about your presidential run, could you give some background about yourself?

     






  • Darryl W. Perry






    I am an author, activist, radio host, and small business owner. I’ve won several awards & recognitions for my writing and editing.
    I first joined the LP in 1999, and have been a life member since 2008. I’ve spent most of my adult life as an advocate & activist for peace and liberty.










  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. Now I know that besides the LP, you’ve been associated with other political parties. Namely, I believe you were one of the founders of the Boston Tea Party, which I believe existed from 2006 to July 2012. What was the general purpose of the party, and why do you think it disbanded? Also, I think you are one of the founders and co-chairmen of the New Hampshire Liberty Party, which promotes individual liberty and NH secession from the US. Could you also briefly talk about that party?



















  • I was involved with the BTP from early on, though I was not a founder of that party. The party was the brainchild of Tom Knapp, who formed the party for a variety of reasons. He said at one time that he wanted to see if the “incrementalists” in the LP would join a party with such a “broad” platform. I believe he also stated one time that he wanted a party for people to go if the LP ever stopped being radically libertarian.
    I believe the party served a purpose in letting the “reformers” in the LP know that not everyone was happy with the changes they wanted to make to the platform and also as a protest party during the 2008 election. The party dissolved because of the lack of activity. During the last National Convention, NOTA won 2 positions on the National Committee, and not long after the convention 2 At-Large reps resigned. The Presidential nominee had a stand-still campaign, despite offers to pay 10% of the ballot access fee to get on the Louisiana & Colorado ballots (a total expense of $1,000).
    At the time I resigned, there were approximately 5 people that could be said to have been “active” in party discussion. The national convention only had 20 or so people “attend” the online convention. The party was dead long before I resigned as chair in July of last year.

    The NH Liberty Party was formed as a secessionist party in New Hampshire, something the state lacked. In the 6 months or so since it was founded, the party has received favorable press from news outlets across the state. The 3 co-chairs of the party were also candidates for the Keene School Board, and the party was mentioned pretty much any time we were mentioned in print or on radio.
    Myself & Ian Freeman (another co-chair) have made several trips to Concord to lobby legislators on various bills, and I believe I have made some headway with a few State Rep’s on possibly getting a ballot access reform bill introduced next session.












  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. Now I’m assuming that you didn’t vote for Bob Barr in 2008. He has since rejoined the GOP and endorsed Gingrich in 2011. However, on your campaign website, you say that you didn’t support Gary Johnson in 2012 or vote for him. So, who did you support in the LP nomination battle, and in the general election, if you are comfortable telling us, who did you support?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I supported Lee Wrights in the LP race, and seconded his nomination to be the official nominee of the LPNH.
    In 2008, I cast a write-in vote for Charles Jay, the BTP nominee.
    In 2012, I cast a write-in vote for NOTA












  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. Now on to your presidential race. The way I see it, there are to big factions in the LP, the Radical caucus, and the Reform caucus. I assume you are more aligned with the radicals. If you are ,why, and do you think you will be able to generate significant support from them in 2016? Also, do you think you will try to reach out to more moderate LPers that might have supported Johnson, and if so, how?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I guess you could say I’m “aligned with the radicals” if by that you mean I believe the LP should stand firm to libertarian principles. I acknowledge that at times we must compromise in order to get legislation heading in our direction, though I refuse to take the incrementalist position as my position (ex. “Fair Tax,” tax & regulate weed, etc).
    As far as caucuses that I actually belong to: I’m a member of Libertarians for Peace, Grassroots Libertarians, LP Sunshine Caucus, LP Anarchists (which seems to be inactive) & The Rent is Too Damn High Caucus (a single issue caucus to get the LPHQ out of the Watergate).
    I’m not going to change my principles to reach out to the “moderates” or the “reformers” in the LP, I intend to run the most radical, principled libertarian campaign in history.










  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Brief question, could you see yourself supporting Libertarians for Life? I am personally pro-life and from your website I think you are too, even if you said you don’t believe in explicitly banning abortion.










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I believe that all human life is valuable, from the unborn child to the elderly. It is one reason that I am strongly anti-war and pro-peace. That said, I do not advocate making abortion illegal because I believe education is a much more effective means of reducing the number of innocent lives lost.
    By education; I mean privately funded sex-ed, and education about the option of giving the baby up for adoption. I do not advocate a government solution to the issue.












  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. Now to segway into your platform, what are, say, the top 3 issues/platform planks your campaign is advocating?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    In 2 words: Peace & Liberty
    Peace: I believe the United States of America should immediately end ALL wars. This includes the military campaigns around the world, militarization of local police, as well as the war on drugs, war on poverty & war on privacy/civil liberties.
    Liberty: Everyone has the right to do with their body and their possessions as they wish, as long as they do not unjustly harm another person. And further, all individuals have the god-given right to life, liberty & pursuit of happiness, whenever governments become destructive of these rights, the people have the right to alter or abolish it. The federal government has been destroying rights since 1791, therefore I believe that the federal government should be abolished!










  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. Do you think the website LewRockwell.com, which you often link to on your site, FPP.cc, also might have a good slogan for you” anti state, anti war, pro market? Unless it’s copyrighted, lol. But anyway, what do you plan to do to build the LP with your campaign? Also, how do you plan on doing outreach to activists? And do you know any people who are going to work on your campaign, or do you have an inclination of potential endorsements you might get?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I like the LRC slogan, though I prefer to say what I’m for that what I’m against.

    I intend to, at every opportunity, promote the ideals of liberty and the principles of libertarianism while promoting the LP as an alternative to the Republicratic Duopoly that currently controls the federal government.
    I can only speculate as to who will support my campaign. As far as reaching out to activists, I intend to use the reach of the various media outlets already at my disposal, and will use as much of my campaign contributions as possible towards media & outreach. (DWP later said, “I’m hoping to get the support of Ruwart & Wrights among others.” )












  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. As far I as I am concerned, you are the first announced LP candidate for 2016. Is it too early for you to think about a potential running mate? Also when do you think you might start aggressively campaigning? And if you’d like to, would you like to comment on potential 2016 LP presidential candidates? So far, I have hear d Gary Johnson mentioned frequently, but Judge Andrew Napolitano has popped up as well.










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I’ve heard people mention Johnson as a 2016 candidate, though after the 2012 election he sounded as though he were not going to run again.
    I like Judge Napolitano, though I don’t think he’d run – he seems to be the kind of guy who would support Rand Paul in the GOP (though that’s speculation).
    Several years ago I had the idea to attend the 2013 Boston Tea Party Annual Reenactment (it’s the 240th anniversary) and then march to Washington, DC. I doubt I’ll do the march to DC, but I believe a campaign event will be planned at the 240th anniversary of the Boston Tea Party. I also intend to attempt to gather support at some more local Libertarian (and libertarian) events this spring, summer & fall.
    As far as running mates, it’s too early to speculate though I’d like to have someone I know & trust be on the ticket with me.










  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok. I’ve been researching some philophies lately, such as anarcho capitalism and voluntarism. Do you support those? Also, on your campaign website I see a link to the United States Pirate Party? Do you support them, and their general principles and goals?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I do not like the term anarcho-capitalism, as it requires a definition of capitalism that most people do not use.
    However, I do generally support the ideas promoted by “an-caps.” I also like the idea of voluntaryism (I’ve seen it with & without the “y”), though most self-proclaimed voluntaryists refuse to engage in electoral politics.
    Regarding the Pirate Party, yes, I do support their principles, and if they decide to nominate a Presidential candidate, I intend to seek that nomination. I believe that current copyright laws are flawed and in serious need of reform. I, personally, release my content under a Creative Commons license, the newspaper I publish is released under a “copyheart” that says “Copying is an act of love. Love is not subject to law.”










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I know that seeking multiple nominations may not be popular with some in the LP, however, I believe that doing so is a way to build coalitions












  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Alright, besides your website, dwp2016.org. are you on social media networks (ie Facebook page, Twitter, YouTube etc)?












  • Darryl W. Perry






    facebook.com/THEDarrylWPerry (personal)
    facebook.com/therealDarrylWPerry (fan page)
    youtube.com/DWPerry78

    at some point in the next few months, I will be moving the website to DarrylWPerry.com



















  • Anything, at all, that you’d like to add for the IPR audience?










  • Darryl W. Perry






    I can’t think of anything at the moment – I can always explain myself in the comment section of IPR










  • Krzysztof Lesiak






    Ok great. It was a fun interview. Thanks.







Friday, March 29, 2013

Two Libertarians In 2012 Came Close to Being Elected State Legislators

This article was published on IPR on February 7, 2013. 

By Krzysztof Lesiak

In 2012, though not a single Libertarian candidate won election to either upper or lower house of any state legislature, two came quite close. In Colorado, Tim Menger managed to secure an impressive 13,951 votes, or 41% of the vote in a two-way race with Republican Jared Wright in the 54th district. The former incumbent in that race, Laura Bradford, had stepped down after her party asked her to resign for using her political post to attempt to avoid a citation for driving while under the influence. However, the candidate chosen to replace her on the party ballot line, Wright, had problems of his own. These included lying about his reason for termination from his employment in a police department and also lying about his reason for filing for personal bankruptcy. These circumstances likely provided fertile ground for Menger and contributed to his strong showing. The race was Menger’s first, and he largely was dependent on a grassroots campaign that utilized homemade signs and word of mouth, during which he stressed the need for legalization of marijuana and a concealed carry law. Menger’s hard work campaigning paid off: he was endorsed by the biggest newspaper in his district, the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel. Prominent endorsements like these are rare treats for candidates running outside of the two-party realm.

In South Carolina, Jeremy Walters fared even better. Walters, a high school dropout, won 5,243 votes, or 46.77% against Republican (but on the ballot as a petition candidate) candidate Raye Felder. Had he won, South Carolina would’ve been the fourth state to elect a Libertarian state legislator, after Alaska, New Hampshire and Vermont.

Felder originally was to appear as a Republican on the ballot but was removed to due a technicality. She subsequently collected enough signatures to appear on the ballot as a petition candidate. The local GOP, sensing she was vulnerable,  tried to get Walters knocked of the ballot, but was unsuccessful in doing so. So, with a place on the ballot secured, Walters proceeded with his campaign that was essentially a match-up between a David and Goliath. Walters was outspent 7 to 1 and produced no TV, newspaper or radio ads. He received only $4,620 in total donations, compared to Felder’s $31,251. A newcomer to politics, Walter originally wanted to run as a Republican, but switched his affiliation to the LP after a dispute with the local GOP, who discouraged him from running. Walters said his campaign received a surge of fresh momentum after LP presidential nominee Gov. Gary Johnson spoke at Winthrop University in his district. Walters received $1,800 in donations following Johnson’s public endorsement of him. Despite the big endorsement, Walters ended up just short of what would have been a key milestone victory for the LP.

Even though he lost, Walters doesn’t necessarily view it in that way. He said:
“I lost but I really didn’t lose.”

Building on that positive attitude and very strong showing as a first-time third party candidate, Walters has stated that he will run again in 2014.

Robby Wells Speaks To Constitution Party National Committee Meeting About His 2016 Campaign

The following was my first article for the Independent Political Report (IPR). It was published on December 31, 2012. 

By Krzysztof Lesiak 

On December 1, 2012, the Constitution Party held their National Committee Meeting in Saint Louis, Missouri. One of the invited guest speakers was Robby Wells, who back in November announced his 2016 presidential candidacy as an independent. Wells had run for the Constitution Party’s presidential nomination this year in April, but came in 3rd place, with 58 votes, or 14.6%.

Wells was introduced by CP National Vice-Chairman Randy Stufflebeam, who said he had received many inquiries from people as to what Robby Wells was up to.  Stufflebeam decided that the best way to set the record straight was to invite Wells to speak to the National Committee meeting.

Wells mostly used his 15 minute speech to promote himself and his campaign, throwing out nifty campaign slogans like “we are not the left wing or the right ring but the bird that sits in the middle.” He also mentioned that he was a national spokesman for the Clarion Call to Unite Committee (CCTUC), headed by Nevada CP activist Cody Quirk, which seeks to unite various constitutionalist parties like the America First Party and Independent American Party and bring them into the Constitution Party fold. He explained that running as an independent was a strategic plan designed to appeal to members of these parties so as to eventually unite them with the CP.

At the end of his speech, Wells took two questions from the audience. The first person inquired about his affiliation with the Reform Party and his support for Virgil Goode. Wells said he did support Goode and stated that he has always been listed as an independent. Earlier, in reference to Goode, Wells noted that “Virgil was so good that I stole his cousin to be my campaign manager.” Aaron Lyles, the present campaign manager for the Robby Wells 2016 campaign, is Goode’s first cousin.

The second individual, noticeably irritated with Wells, asked him if he had paid the $100+ fee that CP members paid to attend the meeting. Wells, after being pressed, admitted that he had not, and the CP member told him that since he had come to campaign, he should “support our group”. He elaborated that what Wells was doing did not feel right with him. Wells, unshaken and still smiling, said that he would cut him a check. After that, there were no more questions, and Wells left, saying he had to catch a flight.

Kristen Meghan, the Chicago press secretary for Wells’s campaign, issued a statement on this last question:
I just want to clarify one of the questions that was asked at the end of the speech. The Robby Wells Restoration team funded their own way to the event, we were invited and the fee one man referred to covered room/food/drinks, which we did not utilize.

Peter Gemma, a member of the CP’s National Executive Committee, attended the meeting. He had the following observations:
Wells was not well received…Outside of his entourage…there was only a smattering of polite applause. He left lots of questions and derisive talk in his wake.

He continued:
CP leaders and grass roots activists at the CP mtg. couldn’t remember anything he said or did to support Virgil Goode. When asked points blank, there was an excruciating 10 second pause before he said, he, um, supported the CP ticket; he offered no specifics and said he was in a rush to catch a plane. Now that he’s running full steam as an independent (since the day after the election), inquiring minds want to know: so, how’s the “continuing to be active in the CP party” thing working out?

In response to Peter Gemma, Robby Wells said this:
I was invited by the Vice Chair of the CP. Did anyone in the CP donate to my campaign when I was traveling around the country helping the CP with ballot access? There were several promises broken by CP members, but I have let that rest. You see, I believe that trivial differences and being small minded is what keeps things from growing. As far as Virgil is concerned, I put out a statement congratulating him. He and I spoke after the National Convention, and I offered to campaign with him. He had my phone number, but I did not receive a call.

Trent Hill, IPR contributor, responded to Wells by writing this comment:
You left the Reform Party, got crushed in the CP convention (And swore you’d stay in the party), decided to try to run as a Republican and win Ron Paul delegates (and won zero), and then decided to run as an Independent. All in about a 10 month period. That’s the definition of inconsistent and opportunistic.

When asked by this reporter if he was seeking the CP nod in 2016, Wells said that his goal was to bring all “Constitutional Conservative Parties” back together and unite them with the Constitution Party to gain traction and produce winning campaigns.

Whatever Wells ultimately decides to do, and regardless of what people think of him, one thing is for sure: this is not the last time that we’ll be hearing from this football coach turned presidential candidate.

A video of Wells speaking to the CP meeting is available below:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmlp1jWL72k

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Will There Soon Be A Libertarian Party Of Poland?

This article was originally posted to Independent Political Report (IPR) today. 

By Krzysztof Lesiak 

The answer to that question increasingly seems to be yes. The Facebook page for the movement to create a Libertarian Party in Poland (Partia Libertariańska) has already garnered over 4,300 likes. Currently Poland has a party called Kongres Nowej Prawicy (Congress of the New Right) which promotes classical liberalism. They have garnered over 29,000 Facebook likes, and in the 2011 parliamentary elections in Poland secured over 151,000 votes, or 1.06% (interestingly enough, this was the same percentage of the vote the LPUS got in the U.S. Senate elections in 2012). Their leader is Janusz Korwin-Mikke, longtime free-market Austrian school economics advocate and 4 time presidential candidate (in the 2010 presidential elections he received his best showing percentage wise ever, garnering 416,898 votes for 2.48% of the vote).  He has been dubbed by several media sources as the “Polish Ron Paul”, and he has frequently referenced to the 3 time presidential candidate and former U.S. congressman on his blog and website, as well as in public interviews. Besides the Kongres Nowej Prawicy, there is also the Unia Polityki Realnej (Real Politics Union), which was founded by Korwin-Mikke but he abondoned it to form his current party. They are now very small, however, and when they ran on a joint coalition with a socially conservative Christian party, Prawica Rzeczypospolitej (Right of the Republic), they received a mere 0.24% of the vote in the 2011 parliamentary elections.

However, the Libertarian Party of Poland, when officially registered as a political party, will become the first genuinely 100% libertarian political party in Poland. In Poland, a very socially conservative country, currently 70% of the people are opposed to gay marriage and 55% also oppose civil unions. Kongres Nowej Prawicy and Unia Polityki Realnej both hold some traditionally conservative views on social issues, as both are explicitly pro-life and against gay marriage (however, they support marijuana legalization). The Libertarian Party of Poland, from its website, gives its members jurisdiction over matters like abortion and gay marriage, and frequently posts links and references to the LPUS. There biggest issue that they are promoting, however, if a free-market economy. Currently, the biggest 6 political parties in Poland all either support crony capitalism or outright economic socialism.

According to an interview with Jacek Sierpiński (who openly calls himself an anarcho-capitalist), one of the founders of the Libertarian Party of Poland, conducted with the news website Salon24, the party is planning on registering as a formal political party in spring of this year. In the interview, his says that Congress of the New Right and Real Politics Union are not genuine hardcore libertarian parties. He calls them conservative-liberal parties that are closer to traditional Polish conservatism and that place a rather significant emphasism on Christian values (Poland is one of the most religiously homogeneous countries in the world, with 95% of the population being Catholic). He says many libertarians in Poland do not want to be lumped in with the right-wing or conservatism in the country. He cites that the Congress of the New Right actually wants to increase defense and military spending as well as expand the police force in the nation, as well as mandatory service in the nation’s armed services for all 18 year old and up able bodied males. He also says the Real Politics Union wants to protect states secret and isn’t big on transparency. He adds that the party wants to censure pornography. He mentioned that the Real Politics Union’s alliance with the Right of the Republican, a very socially conservative Christian party that he labeled as being “anti-freedom” repelled a lot of libertarians from this party. Sierpiński also criticized Janusz Korwin-Mikke, Congress of the New Right’s present leader. He said Korwin-Mikke could be a potential barrier to the Polish Libertarian Party’s potential collaboration with the Congress of the New Right.  He also mentioned that he is an “infoanarchist”, meaning he does not believe in copyright laws and views them as incompatible with true liberty.

Sierpiński further said that the Polish Libertarian Party would neither be a Christian or anti-Christian party, but would rather be neutral in this regard. He stressed individuals will be able to live their lives any way they see fit as long as they are not infringing on the rights and liberties of other people. The party supports all types of gambling, drug legalization, no censorship of pornography, legalization of prostitution, religious liberties (he said the owner of a pharmacy would be able to not sell any contraceptives).  He elaborated by saying that the party supports gay rights, and will oppose the banning of gay parades (in 2004, Lech Kaczyński, president of Warsaw, did not authorize a gay pride parade to take place in his city. Kaczyński later became president of Poland). He also said he wouldn’t oppose parades against homosexuality and in favor of traditional marriage. He said the party has no official stance on abortion, explaining that that libertarians disagree on this issue. He added the party supports euthanasia. He further stated they are against the Polish state financing religion classes in high schools as well as some Catholic universities.  He added the party stresses Internet freedom, and once again called himself an “infoanarchist”.

The Libertarian Party of Poland Website is below (you can Google translate the whole website if you’re interested):

http://partialibertarianska.org/

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

YouTube Playlist for My Radio Show, The Lesiak Report

My inaugural broadcast of The Lesiak Report aired on LibertyMovementRadio.com on February 17th. The show airs every Sunday at 10 AM CST. Here is a playlist for all the shows I've had so far, that I have archived as YouTube videos:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkOOF2GNI6OrBQIKMSZE58ZfT07dWCTuh

Also, please subscribe to my YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ngfan1.